1) “The Many Lives of Pauli Murray” (The New Yorker, 21 minutes, April 2017).
The subhead: “She was an architect of the civil-rights struggle—and the women’s movement. Why haven’t you heard of her? ”
The wager was ten dollars.
It was 1944, and the law students of Howard University were discussing how best to bring an end to Jim Crow.
In the half century since Plessy v. Ferguson, lawyers had been chipping away at segregation by questioning the “equal” part of the “separate but equal” doctrine—arguing that, say, a specific black school was not truly equivalent to its white counterpart.
Fed up with the limited and incremental results, one student in the class proposed a radical alternative: why not challenge the “separate” part instead?
That student’s name was Pauli Murray.
Her law-school peers were accustomed to being startled by her—she was the only woman among them and first in the class—but that day they laughed out loud.
Her idea was both impractical and reckless, they told her; any challenge to Plessy would result in the Supreme Court affirming it instead.
Undeterred, Murray told them they were wrong.
Then, with the whole class as her witness, she made a bet with her professor, a man named Spottswood Robinson: ten bucks said Plessy would be overturned within twenty-five years.
Murray was right.
Plessy was overturned in a decade—and, when it was, Robinson owed her a lot more than ten dollars.
In her final law-school paper, Murray had formalized the idea she’d hatched in class that day, arguing that segregation violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.
Some years later, when Robinson joined with Thurgood Marshall and others to try to end Jim Crow, he remembered Murray’s paper, fished it out of his files, and presented it to his colleagues—the team that, in 1954, successfully argued Brown v. Board of Education.